Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zero no Tsukaima:Volume3 Chapter4"

From Baka-Tsuki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
We really should be more consistent with names and terms. We should probably come a decision on things such as what the various mage's nicknames are so that we don't keep translating it differently. One example on this page is Guiche's familiar. Here (s)he's Belldandy, but I believe that in all of the places prior to this chapter that the mole's name has been given, it's been Verdandi. Personally, I'm tempted to go look up what the various names are in Geneon's dub for the first season of the anime and just use those names since that's an official translation. In either case, we need greater consistency than we have with regards to names.
==Edict==
 
   
  +
--[[User:Kalessin|Kalessin]]
Throughout the chapter the word "edict" is used to refer to something Louise has to say during the Princess's wedding ceremony.
 
   
  +
The naming convention: http://www.baka-tsuki.net/project/index.php?title=Zero_no_Tsukaima:Guideline#Naming_Conventions
1. A decree or proclamation issued by an authority and having the force of law. 2. A formal pronouncement or command.
 
   
  +
[[User:Vaelis|Vaelis]] 22:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Though the material from the chapters where Louise actually gets the assignment from the princess are missing, the sense I get is Louise is to deliver a speech about the princess, not issuing law.
 
   
  +
A slightly more up-to-date one would still be this [[Zero_no_Tsukaima:guidelines|guidelines]], since I have seen Akirasav updating/adding more terms into this page after Const2K added the terms inside into the main guidelines page. An assimilation and removal of the unnecessary page would be a good idea, I think.
Would speech be more accurate here?
 
   
--[[User:Delwack|Delwack]] 10:01, 16 November 2007 (PST)
+
--[[User:Zyzzyva165|Zyzzyva165]] 23:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
   
  +
I've solved this problem by using the "include" function.
At first i thought so too, but the it uses the word 詔, which has the definition of "imperial decree or imperial edict", edict definetly doesn't sound right for a wedding though...
 
  +
  +
[[User:Vaelis|Vaelis]] 09:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  +
  +
Well that's good to know. The appropriate terms still need to be used, however. Of course, a large number of the chapters for Zero no Tsukaima are labeled as being previews, so a fair amount of editing is likely needed anyway.
  +
  +
--[[User:Kalessin|Kalessin]] 07:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:32, 4 February 2009

We really should be more consistent with names and terms. We should probably come a decision on things such as what the various mage's nicknames are so that we don't keep translating it differently. One example on this page is Guiche's familiar. Here (s)he's Belldandy, but I believe that in all of the places prior to this chapter that the mole's name has been given, it's been Verdandi. Personally, I'm tempted to go look up what the various names are in Geneon's dub for the first season of the anime and just use those names since that's an official translation. In either case, we need greater consistency than we have with regards to names.

--Kalessin

The naming convention: http://www.baka-tsuki.net/project/index.php?title=Zero_no_Tsukaima:Guideline#Naming_Conventions

Vaelis 22:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

A slightly more up-to-date one would still be this guidelines, since I have seen Akirasav updating/adding more terms into this page after Const2K added the terms inside into the main guidelines page. An assimilation and removal of the unnecessary page would be a good idea, I think.

--Zyzzyva165 23:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

I've solved this problem by using the "include" function.

Vaelis 09:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Well that's good to know. The appropriate terms still need to be used, however. Of course, a large number of the chapters for Zero no Tsukaima are labeled as being previews, so a fair amount of editing is likely needed anyway.

--Kalessin 07:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)