Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gundam Unicorn"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So, the person who added all the double angle brackets: may I ask why that was done? I assume, based on what you put in brackets that it was to italicize those things, but there are a few usage issues with what you've put there RE: how italics are used. Anyway, I let me know if that's actually why you put those there, and I'll incorporate the appropriate parts into what I'm doing. [[User:TheWonko|TheWonko]] 22:05, 30 May 2012 (CDT) |
So, the person who added all the double angle brackets: may I ask why that was done? I assume, based on what you put in brackets that it was to italicize those things, but there are a few usage issues with what you've put there RE: how italics are used. Anyway, I let me know if that's actually why you put those there, and I'll incorporate the appropriate parts into what I'm doing. [[User:TheWonko|TheWonko]] 22:05, 30 May 2012 (CDT) |
||
| + | The adding of the << >> was done to indicate terminology usage. If you look at the edit history for Volume 2 Chapter 3 you should see that for mobile suit names, ship names and colony names, Teh_Ping had put their names in between << >>. I thought this was done to indicate terminology usage like in the Sword Art Online project which uses « » for any place names, terminology etc. Really I should have used « » like the SAO project but I couldn't figure out how to type those so instead I used << >> instead like Teh_Ping did for Volume 2 Chapter 3. So the edits to Unicorn adding << >> was done to indicate terminology, as I thought it was the standard way to denote project specific terminology. You can remove them if you want. |
||
| − | The adding of the << >> was done to indicate terminology usage. |
||
| − | If you look at the edit history for Volume 2 Chapter 3 you should see that for mobile suit names, ship names and colony names, Teh_Ping had put their names in between << >>.I thought this was done to indicate terminology usage like in the Sword Art Online project which uses « » for any place names, terminology etc. Really I should have used « » like the SAO project but I couldn't figure out how to type those so instead I used << >> instead like Teh_Ping did for Volume 2 Chapter 3. |
||
| − | So the edits to Unicorn adding << >> was done to indicate terminology, as I thought it was the standard way to denote project specific terminology. You can remove them if you want. |
||
Revision as of 11:02, 31 May 2012
So, the person who added all the double angle brackets: may I ask why that was done? I assume, based on what you put in brackets that it was to italicize those things, but there are a few usage issues with what you've put there RE: how italics are used. Anyway, I let me know if that's actually why you put those there, and I'll incorporate the appropriate parts into what I'm doing. TheWonko 22:05, 30 May 2012 (CDT)
The adding of the << >> was done to indicate terminology usage. If you look at the edit history for Volume 2 Chapter 3 you should see that for mobile suit names, ship names and colony names, Teh_Ping had put their names in between << >>. I thought this was done to indicate terminology usage like in the Sword Art Online project which uses « » for any place names, terminology etc. Really I should have used « » like the SAO project but I couldn't figure out how to type those so instead I used << >> instead like Teh_Ping did for Volume 2 Chapter 3. So the edits to Unicorn adding << >> was done to indicate terminology, as I thought it was the standard way to denote project specific terminology. You can remove them if you want.
